Replacing old gas services often brings to mind images of deep trenches cutting across lawns, driveways and gardens. This traditional trenching method is not only disruptive but also carries a significant price tag. For utility companies, the process can be slow and labor-intensive, causing major inconvenience for residents. It’s time to rethink the old approach and the message is clear: stop trenching!
Let’s take a side-by-side look at the traditional trenching method versus the trenchless approach using the Kobus Pipe Puller KPP400.
The future of pipe replacement is less about digging and more about smart efficient technology. By moving away from disruptive excavation, you can deliver projects faster, reduce your environmental footprint and keep communities happy. Considering making the switch? Let’s look at the numbers.
|
Feature |
Traditional Trenching |
Trenchless Method (Kobus KPP400) |
|
Average Cost per Job |
$8,000 – $10,000 |
$3,000 |
|
Average Cost Saving |
– |
$5,000 per replacement |
|
Job Completion Time* |
2 – 3 days |
1 day |
|
Impact to Residents |
High (inconvenience due to added time; significant ground/yard disruption |
Low (minimal disruption and noise) |
|
Environmental Impact |
High (major ground excavation, ecosystem disruption) |
Low (minimal excavation, preserves landscape) |
|
Environmental Impact |
High (major ground excavation, ecosystem disruption) |
Low (minimal excavation, preserves landscape |
|
Summary |
Costly, slow, and highly disruptive to residents and the environment. |
Fast, cost-effective, and minimizes impact on both residents and property. |
But what about the initial investment required to make the switch? Based on reported cost savings from customers, it takes about 14 jobs to cover the cost of making the switch to trenchless operations. Considering the KPP400 is intended to be used for many years, a utility can expect years of saving ahead by switching to the Kobus trenchless method.